An FH Author's Night on the Town

I presented my autobiography, A Schizophrenic Will: A Story of Madness, A Story of Hope, to a crowd of roughly 25 people on Tuesday, October 9th at the Beth Israel Medical Center, Bernstein Pavilion, Podell Auditorium. The event was organized by MDSG (Mood Disorders Support Group of NYC)

I did a dramatic reading of the first chapter of my book, "How Far Down Does This Rabbit Hole Go?," which is a line I took from Morpheus of the movie The Matrix. I chose to use the line because a first psychotic break can have a very surreal quality about it; mine sure did. I felt the night went very well because after my presentation, there was a barrage of friendly questions from the audience. The questions finally had to be halted by Tory Masters, the event coordinator, because time ran out.

I’m happy to say I sold 13 books that evening, and my autobiography sometimes joins the top twenty in its category on Amazon.com—below A Beautiful Mind by Sylvia Nasar and The Center Cannot Hold by Elyn Saks, but I’m in good company.

Watch the first part of my presentation below. (Thanks for taping me, Mom!)


 

Will Jiang, MLS
Employment Unit, Fountain House

 

0 Comments

Three New Fellows Begin Executive Program

Last year, Fountain House launched the Michael Walther Executive Fellowship, a nine-month practicum intended to prepare the next generation of leaders in the worldwide clubhouse movement.

The Quandary of a "Biochemical Imbalance"

We, from the mental health community, basically believe that emotional illness is due to a biochemical imbalance of the brain.

It seems to make sense; after all, emotional illness is due to aberrant thoughts and feelings. And where do these originate from? Well, they’re products of brain processes. These functions are the result of biochemical reactions. For it must be remembered that the brain is, in a sense, a biochemical factory.   All these chemicals, working together in very complex ways, produce our thoughts and feelings.

So, if you’re having serious problems with abnormal thoughts and feelings, they’re due to the biochemistry of the brain, of course. This biochemistry has something wrong with it—“a biochemical imbalance”—which plays havoc with thoughts and feelings.

The “cure” for this “biochemical imbalance” is to “fix it” with remedial chemicals—medicines. In a sense, these “pharmaceuticals” restore the biochemistry to a “normal balance.”

Our experiences reinforce this belief. For example, five years ago I was very psychotic. I was experiencing severe delusions and hallucinations, so I was hospitalized for six weeks. My medications regimen was altered, and the voices and paranoia lifted. And it was totally due to the medicines. The “biochemical imbalance” was repaired. I’m sure many of us have experienced similar episodes or know people to whom this has happened.

This process—chemicals producing thoughts and feelings—makes for interesting speculation. It must be the same for “normal people” with their thoughts and feelings; however, they’re generated by “normal biochemistry.”

According to this philosophical viewpoint, thoughts and feelings—what makes us humans—are out of our control. They’re all chemical reactions which, like those of people with mental illness, can’t be controlled by the individual. Consequently, who we are, such as our morals and thoughts, are the products of a biochemistry that an individual can’t control. After all, those with mental illness can’t control them either.

If we’re the products of an independently functioning set of chemical processes, then we are not responsible for what we do—and now I’m referring to “normal people.” Let’s say you lead a criminal lifestyle. You can say it’s not your fault—you’re not responsibleIt’s simply one of the many versions of “normal biochemistry.” In the same way, liars, manipulators, the indolent are not responsible for their reprehensible behaviors. It’s due to biochemistry, which individuals can’t control—like their heartbeats.

What is the final implication of this philosophy? There is no free will; we’re incapable of making moral choices, for our behaviors are controlled by mechanistic, predetermined chemical processes.

Therefore the concept of morality—knowing right from wrong and acting accordingly—is now null. It’s a mere fantasy. We can’t choose our moral behaviors. After all, the way chemistry works is in a predicted and necessary manner. Chemical processes, it must be remembered, work systematically and cannot choose how they will unfold. It’s a chemical reaction. This must be stressed and always kept in mind.

But, again, back to those with mental illness. “Regular people” have trouble understanding what mental illness is. If we say it’s due to a “biochemical imbalance,” it seems to make it more intuitively comprehensible. It makes us less “alien,” for we are suffering from an illness like diabetes—a disease of the biochemical imbalance of insulin. Consequently, we now suffer from “physical disease.”

Other theories of emotional illness, specifically psychological theories, are difficult for the layman to understand; after all, psychological theories deal with the unconscious, a concept that makes matters obscure. People ask, “What is the unconscious?” but in the end, all we can say is that everybody has it, but they’re not aware of it. 

I, however, think that psychological theories, as opposed to “medical” ones, can not only explain mental illness - they can cure it. They also bring back free will and personal responsibility into the picture.

But those are for other essays.

Decio A. Calderon
2nd floor, Fountain House
0 Comments

The Mid-States Clubhouse Round Up

sites/default/files/mid-states-round-up.jpgOn September 4th, I flew to Norman, Oklahoma with Megan Hunter from the Wellness Unit and Andrew Schonebaum from Administration. We attended the Mid-States Clubhouse Roundup, which was hosted by Thunderbird Clubhouse in Norman, Oklahoma and Crossroads Clubhouse from Tulsa, Oklahoma.
 
It was a homecoming of sorts for Megan, who is an alumna of the University of Oklahoma. Andrew met up with a former Fountain House co-worker, James Wineinger, who some may remember from the Employment Unit. James is now the director of Crossroads Clubhouse, one of the co-sponsors of the conference.
 
There were morning and afternoon workshops to choose from, such as “Clubhouse Housing,” “Accreditation,” “Advocacy and Coalition Building,” and my personal favorite, “Clubhouse 101.” Megan and I were on the panel of a workshop focusing on wellness, and I hope we represented Fountain House well. I know Megan did – her microphone battery gave out, but without missing a beat, she delivered an excellent presentation on our Wellness Unit.

During the course of the wellness workshop, the sobering statistic that persons with mental illness die on an average of 20 - 30 years younger was mentioned frequently, and it was encouraging to see how concerned the staff and members were about this issue.
 
Every workshop focused on a different aspect of clubhouse culture and how to improve by sharing knowledge and resources. I was very impressed with the presentation on Building Coalitions in the Community by the staff and members of Magnolia House in Ohio and Independence Center (the second largest clubhouse in the world) from Missouri. The director of Independence Center spoke eloquently on the need for connections with organizations such as NAMI, Rotary Clubs, and even other behavioral health centers, which often are seen as competitors for funding. I asked him about faith-based connections and mentioned that, in New York, the Ethical Culture Society (secular humanists) had funded and built a thriving mental health center. I was curious whether a religious connection might be a problem when receiving state financing.
 
Our Middle State clubhouses appear to be thriving. I took a tour of Thunderbird Clubhouse in Norman and found it very warm and welcoming. They have two units, Culinary and Clerical, and the members and staff were just great about showing us around.
 
There was also plenty of time for fun as well; the food was plentiful and delicious, and on Thursday evening we had a dance with country and line dancing that was just terrific. I met some wonderful people and had some great conversations with members and staff from various clubhouses. The music was great, and folks went from table to table with their cameras to capture the moment!
               
There is a lot more I could and would like to write about, but my best take away was from a member. She described her pre-Clubhouse days as “doing things by myself, for myself” which continues to resonate with me. Nothing wrong with “by myself, for myself” in moderation – but a lot of us folks with mental illness take this to an extreme, in large part due to the illness. Here at Fountain House and in the wider Clubhouse world as I experienced it that week, we work TOGETHER for a common goal that benefits everyone – this seems (to me, at least) to be a far superior way of living.    

Eileen Fantoli
Employment Unit, Fountain House
0 Comments

A Case Study of Academic Exclusion

sites/default/files/segun_bevin_0.jpgThe Fountain House program of treatment for people with serious mental illness has been helping people and influencing program development for over 60 years. The community model developed at Fountain House has been extensively replicated in the United States and around the world. It was a major influence in the psychosocial rehabilitation movement and the clubhouse movement, and its programs in advocacy, employment, education, wellness, housing, and artistic creativity are state of the art.

As its base, this model has an intentionally-created working community to which members belong. There, members are needed, and they have the opportunity to build their self-efficacy, motivation and relationships. In short, Fountain House is a place where, at their own pace, members can build confidence and acquire the interpersonal and work skills necessary to find a sense of purpose and fulfillment in the general community.

Yet no course on the Fountain House model or its practices exists in any university or department teaching prospective social workers or psychiatric rehabilitation counselors or, for that matter, ANY prospective helping professional. Why?

To help discover an answer to this conundrum, I posit the notion that the creation of the Fountain House model by John Henderson Beard was the result of his ability to think "outside of the box." Thinking "outside of the box" in developing programs for people with mental illness, I believe, means a focus on satisfying their real needs by incorporating new professional skills in the program plan or utilizing old professional skills, practiced in a new way.

Based on my forty-five years in the field, programs that most planners create to help at-risk client groups - including people with serious mental illness - are usually the result of "in the box" thinking which utilizes professional skills that are consistent with graduate school training courses. I have further observed that these programs have the effect of creating a comfortable working environment for staff but do not always meet the comprehensive needs of the people they are intended to serve.

On the other hand, an "out of the box” program has problems, too. Since it requires new ways of doing things, some professionals exposed to these practices experience discomfort and even question the program’s professionalism. I'm speculating that, as a way to handle this discomfort, they label the new "out of the box" program, as adjunctive. An adjunctive status label quiets their concerns, because it implies that there are other programs in existence, consistent with university training, that represent the major thrust in the effort to assist the seriously mentally ill in the community.  A program labeled as adjunctive is a semi-professional supportive element of that effort.

The “adjunctive” program may be mentioned in graduate schools, but its underlying theories are not taught in university departments. The new skill set that this new program requires is not taught, not only because the program’s status, but also because no professors are adequately trained in its methodology. As a result of this somewhat negative circularity, the “out of the box” program must develop extensive, expensive, and time-consuming in-service training programs for new staff, and it must depend on the word of mouth praise by clients and their families for support, growth and development.

Even when, as in the case of Fountain House, an “out of the box” program is successful in meeting the needs of an at-risk group of people, is praised by clients and family members, and is replicated in the US and around the world, professional schools are still incapable of overcoming the erroneously assigned adjunctive status label.  It’s doubly galling to me that these academics somehow feel that they then have the right to criticize a program about which they know little.

So far, I have come to the conclusion that the Fountain House social practice has been excluded from academia because its methods and practices are not widely understood. Professionals trivialize it as a treatment modality, categorizing it is as adjunctive to the “real” treatment of seriously mentally ill adults.

However, there  must be another reason for Fountain House’s exclusion. I’ve been thinking long and hard on this question, and I’ve come to the conclusion that, regardless of effectiveness, any program that does not have an office-based, one-on-one or group counseling process of some sort at the core of its design, will be forever considered adjunctive.  That’s what is taught, that’s what is considered professional, and that’s what makes traditional workers comfortable.

Julius Lanoil
Consultant, Education and Wellness, Fountain House
0 Comments

Harvesting a Healthier Lifestyle

sites/default/files/garden.jpgFountain House is currently enjoying the many and varied fruits of the hard work done in High Point Farm’s gardens and orchard. Two acres of the farm are devoted to growing a variety of produce. Half of this is cultivated each year for vegetables and flowers and half contains the orchard from which we produce gallons of delicious apple cider each fall. The effort needed to plan, prepare, maintain and harvest a garden is huge and has involved a large and diverse group of Fountain House members.

The gardens have been expanded over the last 3 or 4 years as we have sought to increase the amount of produce that we can provide to Fountain House. This is part of a ‘closing the loop’ strategy which the farm has adopted and which seeks to ensure that the work that we do here at High Point results in an end product that can be returned to Fountain House in New York. The expansion means that we now have more than 20,000 sq ft of land under cultivation producing delicious and healthful veggies as well as beautiful cut flowers every week from the beginning of June right through into the fall.

As any gardener will tell you the work is never over. As soon as the last crop is harvested in the fall, we begin plans for the following season. Learning from past mistakes we decided to focus this year on crops that could easily be transported from northern New Jersey to Manhattan. With this in mind we have grown onions, leeks, garlic, beets, carrots, potatoes, kale, broccoli, cabbage, cucumbers, tomatoes, peppers, watermelons and cantaloupe melons. All of these crops are robust and easily survived the two-hour trip. Without exception, we’ve been very pleased with our crops, and many members have commented that the flavor of our produce is superior to anything they can buy in the supermarket.

Our produce is grown without chemicals. Whilst not certified organic, we use only the manure provided by our alpacas, llamas and chickens to condition our soil. During the growing season we supplement this with a few other organic products to ensure that our work does not go unrewarded with a poor crop. Well, at least most of the time.

A universal gardening experience is confronting the reality that there are a multitude of critters out there which like the things you want to grow and have no respect for property rights. Imagine this gardener’s displeasure when more than 200 broccoli plants - plants that had been lovingly tended to by staff and members - were devoured in a matter of hours one morning this June.

The culprit was undoubtedly a four legged criminal such as a woodchuck or a rabbit, and I don’t mind admitting that I wanted blood. I was persuaded to resist taking any drastic action by my Buddhist leaning co-manager, and since then we have managed to protect our crops with a solar powered electric fence. However I can still sense that anger when I see a rabbit or woodchuck loitering with intent near recent transplants.

Sadly, there was no protecting our apple trees from the effects of a sharp frost at the end of April, and our apple crop will be much reduced from the one that produced over 100 gallons of cider last year. The vagaries of the weather or the appetites of wild animals are just two of the challenges that face us as we strive to play our part in improving the health and well being of the members of Fountain House. However, it’s clear that the pleasure derived from growing the crops, from turning the veggies into a nutritious meal, or from simply eating such a meal is more than enough justification for taking time this fall to think about how we are going to meet those challenges next year.

Steven Pike
Manager, High Point Farm

 
0 Comments

Kings Park: Stories from and American Mental Institution

Fountain House hosted a benefit screening of Kings Park on June 20th at the SVA Theatre in NYC.

EVENT DETAILS

DESCRIPTION

The Fountain House Council on Training, Education and Advocacy hosted a benefit screening of Kings Park, a documentary by noted filmmakers Lucy Winer and Karen Eaton on June 20th at the SVA Theatre in NYC.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

 

Summer In The Garden

Members, staff, board members and friends joined together for the annual Summer in the Garden event, hosted by Fountain House President, Kenneth J. Dudek and Board Chair, Lorna Hyde Graev.

EVENT DETAILS

DESCRIPTION 

Members, staff, board members and friends joined together for the annual Summer in the Garden event, hosted by Fountain House President, Kenneth J. Dudek and Board Chair, Lorna Hyde Graev. Guests enjoyed an assortment of delicious hors d’oeuvres in the beautiful Stuart W. Hinrichs Garden. Tours were given by Fountain House members.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

 

End of Annual Meeting Season Celebration

The 9th End of Annual Meeting Season Celebration benefited Fountain Gallery, the premier venue in New York City representing artists with mental illness.

EVENT DETAILS

DESCRIPTION 

The 9th End of Annual Meeting Season Celebration benefited Fountain Gallery, the premier venue in New York City representing artists with mental illness.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Innisfree
Broadridge
UPRR
Carl T. Hagberg and Associates
Lilly
Edg3
Ellen Philip Associates
Optimizer

Computershare
Georgeson

AST Link Group
Link Shareholder
Phoenix

Alliance Advisors, LLC
EZOnline Documents, LLC
Barry Shapiro
Regan & Associates, Inc.
Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company

PSEG
ShareGift USA
TriState Financial Press

Picture 23.png
Syndicate content